SEBI's Securitized Debt Instruments

Simple explanation

Securitised Debt Instruments (SDIs) are when loans are bundled together and sold as bonds. Right now, SEBI’s rules say a pool can’t have more than 25% from one borrower, so you can’t securitise a single big loan. RBI already allows single-asset deals. SEBI is proposing to relax its rules for RBI-regulated entities, plus fix trustee and disclosure norms, so the market works smoother and more deals can get listed.

The core idea

  1. Align SEBI with RBI: Remove the 25% single-obligor cap for RBI-regulated entities so single-asset securitisation can be listed.
  2. Make SDI market practical: Shift disclosures to servicers, fix trustee replacement rules, and ease related-party restrictions to reduce roadblocks.

Key concepts

One analogy

Think of SDIs like selling a box of assorted chocolates. SEBI’s old rule said “no box can be >25% one flavor” to avoid risk. But RBI already lets you sell a box with just one flavor if it’s a bank’s product. SEBI now says “fine, if RBI approves the recipe, you can sell single-flavor boxes too” — and also changes who writes the nutrition label and who manages the store if the manager quits.

Common confusions

  1. “SEBI is removing all diversification rules” → No
    The 25% cap is relaxed only for RBI-regulated entities. Others still follow it.

  2. “Any company can do single-asset deals now” → No
    Exemption applies to RBI-regulated originators — banks, NBFCs, HFCs. Not unregulated firms.

  3. “This means higher risk for investors” → Not necessarily
    Single-asset SDIs are transparent — one loan, one obligor. Risk is concentrated but visible. RBI already allows it with safeguards.

Revision table

Aspect Current SEBI Rule Proposed Change – May 2026 Reason/Impact
Single obligor limit Max 25% of asset pool from one borrower Exempt RBI-regulated entities → allow 100% single-asset securitisation Aligns with RBI 2021 framework; unlocks more listed deals
Disclosure responsibility Originator must give quarterly performance reports Shift to servicer who collects/monitors receivables Better accuracy; servicer has real-time data
Trustee cancellation Scheme must be wound up if trustee registration cancelled Appoint new trustee instead of winding up Avoids disruption; matches RBI norms
SPDE board composition No specific cap for originator RBI-regulated originator: max 1 member, no veto power Stronger governance, prevents conflict
Related-party transactions Originator and SPDE can’t be in same group Allowed if originator is RBI-regulated Removes unnecessary barrier for banks/NBFCs
Objective Risk mitigation via diversification Harmonize with RBI, ease doing business Boost listed SDI market, improve liquidity
Applicability All securitisation under SEBI Relaxations only for RBI-regulated entities Targeted ease, not blanket dilution
Comments deadline N/A May 25, 2026 Not final yet; feedback phase

Slide 1 — SEBI Proposes Reforms in Securitised Debt Instruments

What Happened?


Slide 2 — Why It Matters

Why This Is Important

Key Points

Simple Definitions


Q&A Table

Question Answer
Which regulator proposed reforms for India’s securitised debt instruments market framework? SEBI
What type of securitisation structure did SEBI propose permitting for RBI-regulated entities? Single-asset securitisation
Which existing regulatory restriction currently limits single-asset securitisation transactions? Single borrower exposure limits
Besides securitisation structures, which governance-related area did SEBI propose modifying? SPDE governance structure
With which institution’s framework does SEBI seek alignment through proposed SDI reforms? Reserve Bank of India